How – Inside the AI OS: running governed agents on your own cluster, liveRegister →
Government · Criminal Investigation

Investigative Case File Analysis under the Law Enforcement Directive

A financial-crime or organised-crime case runs to tens of thousands of pages of statements, seized documents, phone extractions and bank records. Investigators cannot read it all, and none of it can be pasted into a public AI service.

Applies toGovernment
The challenge

What stands in the way

A financial-crime or organised-crime case runs to tens of thousands of pages of statements, seized documents, phone extractions and bank records. Investigators cannot read it all, and none of it can be pasted into a public AI service.
The solution

How Scrydon solves it

Models running inside the force's own environment read the case file, extract people, places, accounts, vehicles and events into a case graph, and answer investigators' questions with citations back to the page, under the access controls the case already has.
In practice

How this plays out

Large investigations fail on volume. A seized laptop or a set of bank subpoenas can produce more material than the team can read before a custody deadline, and the connection that matters is often a phone number that appears once in a statement and once in a spreadsheet.

The platform ingests the case file within the force's own perimeter, extracts entities and events into a graph that is scoped to the case, and lets investigators ask questions in plain language. Every answer cites the pages it came from, so a lead can be checked by a human before it becomes an action, and a defence lawyer can be shown the trail. Access follows the case's existing clearance model: an investigator sees what they are entitled to, and nothing else.

Processing personal data for law-enforcement purposes falls under the Law Enforcement Directive rather than GDPR, and profiling and AI use in policing are high-risk under the EU AI Act. Running the models on the force's own sovereign cluster, with a full record of prompts, sources and outputs, gives the data protection officer and the court the evidence they need.

Explore AI Governance
The result
  • Weeks of reading become days, every lead is traceable to its source document, and the analysis is defensible in court because the process is logged.

Or write to us

Tell us what you are working on and who should reply. A person reads it and replies within one business day.

We only use these details to reply to you. Privacy policy

Prefer to write? Email hello [at] scrydon.com and we will get back to you.